Fight Member Item Corruption Using Participatory Budgeting

Statement in Support of Participatory Budgeting Reform of Member Items by City Council Candidate Ben Kallos

This week’s events call attention to the importance that each one of the fifty-one members of the City’s only legislature have in determining how we as a City spend $77.7 billion dollars, comprising the fourth largest budget in the country after the federal, and California, and New York State budgets.

We are running our City Council campaign in the way we believe government should be run, with the first ever open platform that empowers the electorate with the freedom to shape our policies by submitting solutions to improve the community in which they live. 

We plan to bring the same transparency to the budget process with our year-old pledge to distribute Member Item funding using the Participatory Budgeting process that empowers local residents with the freedom to determine how their tax dollars are spent to support and improve their own communities.

Non-profits in the community have often fallen victim to predatory budgeting practices by members of the legislature that use Member Item funding. Legislators are responsible for serving their constituents, but many use Member Item funding to instead demand personal or political financial gain.  Participatory Budgeting can help end this form of corruption so that fewer non-profits will be forced to choose between using tax dollars to benefit politicians instead of communities in need.

In the second year of the project, eight councilmembers are already participating allowing their community to directly decide how to spend more than $10 million in tax revenue.  Ironically, Council Member Dan Halloran, who engaged in Participatory Budgeting, managed to get in trouble with the Member Item funds that he kept to distribute on his own.  This bizarre twist emphasizes that Participatory Budgeting cannot be treated as proof that there is no corruption or the appearance thereof.  It also raises the question of whether Participatory Budgeting should be mandatory and if it should be the sole vehicle for distribution of all Member Item funding.

Once elected, we hope to bring my experience running a non-profit and as a technology entrepreneur to create an open infrastructure to transparently host the Participatory Budget process so that government has the tools to empower the community with the freedom to determine how their tax dollars are spent.

This year has the opportunity to bring sweeping change to City government. We can create a new system where residents are empowered and enfranchised, diluting the old Albany culture of pay-to-play and tit-for-tat corruption.  Let’s not squander the opportunity.